Sunday, 11 November 2012

Scientology comes to Israel


The Independent


A renovated cinema is the centrepiece of the controversial church's attempt to rebrand its image internationally, writes Matthew Kalman in Jaffa, Israel

 
JAFFA
 
SUNDAY 11 NOVEMBER 2012

From the moment it opened in 1937, the soaring art deco façade of the Alhambra cinema in Jaffa became one of the city's most recognizable landmarks, its 1,000-seat auditorium patronized by Jews, Arabs and British Mandate officials alike.

Now, after decades of neglect, the complex has been renovated as the first public Middle East centre for the Church of Scientology, the controversial movement founded by writer and explorer L Ron Hubbard whose followers include John Travolta and Tom Cruise.

From the multi-media consoles in the foyer, through the dozen lecture halls in the academy upstairs, to the 450-seat auditorium beneath the ornamental moulded plaster ceiling, to the replica of Michaelangelo's mosaic in the Piazza del Campidoglio in Rome on the colonnaded roof terrace, the three-storey, 60,000-square-foot, multi-million-pound monolith is a gleaming, hi-tech cathedral to the teachings of Hubbard and his successor, David Miscavige. In one corner there is even a room designed as Hubbard's office in Middle Eastern style – a tribute to the founder, who died in 1986.

The Alhambra is the latest in a string of more than 50 similar centres around the world inaugurated by Mr Miscavige in recent years as part of his new Ideal Scientology Organization – known to movement insiders as the Ideal Org.

"We feel we have to answer properly the many questions that people have about Scientology and we feel we have not been really described properly so far," says Fabio Amicarelli, an Ideal Org spokesman. "Our door has always been open but now we are more open than ever and we are ready to show everything."

Passers-by looking at the colourful window displays of Hubbard's work translated into a myriad of languages are invited inside by eager church members in smart black trousers and pressed white shirts. In the foyer, they encounter a multi-media forest of screens and displays dedicated to the life and work of Hubbard and each of the 21 precepts dubbed "The Way to Happiness" that is the church's founding catechism.

"We believe that man is a spiritual being – this is the focus of the Scientology religion," says Amicarelli. "Man is basically good."

"The word 'Scientology' is a Greek-Latin fusion meaning 'Knowing how to know.' This creates a deep social commitment," he says. "When you study who you are, you develop a desire to improve conditions around you, to improve life around you."

The Scientologists have developed a range of community initiatives, including literacy and drug prevention, prisoner rehabilitation, human rights and volunteer disaster relief programmes. Some 500 videos chronicle the church's work around the world, highlighting anti-narcotics collaboration with law enforcement agencies in the US and the implementation of their Applied Scholastics pedagogical techniques in hundreds of schools through government education ministries in Denmark and other countries.

Visitors can sign up for courses after undergoing a personality test supervised by a confessor-counsellor known as an Auditor using an Electrometer, which the church claims can measure the negative effect of past experiences on the human mind.

Members can become more involved by enrolling in the college on the upper floor, and through more study at the church's main centres in the United States.

However, Scientologists have provoked ridicule and fear for most of the 40 years they have been active in Israel.

In 1987, an inter-ministerial committee on cults headed by former Deputy Minister of Education Miriam Ta'asa-Glazer, published a damning 500-page report recommending tighter restrictions on Scientology and other movements, but little was done. In 2011, the Ministry of Social Welfare commissioned a new report that recommended legislation banning cult activity. Nothing happened.

Now, Rachel Lichtenstein, director of the Israeli Centre For Cult Victims, says she is disappointed that Tel Aviv City Council approved the Alhambra.

"It shows there are still people in public positions who don't understand what cults are," she says. "It's very sad. I can understand the legal process and the city council saying it has no right to intervene because it's a private building that they purchased. But it's very sad that no-one was aware enough to get up and say something about what this cult of Scientology can do."

But Ron Huldai, mayor of Tel Aviv, says he had no grounds to withhold permission. "When somebody is doing something that is allowed by the law, I have to follow the law. That's it. It doesn't matter if I like it or don't like it. So long as they are operating within the law I cannot prevent them from operating in this country."

Speaking at the centre's opening in August, Mr Miscavige called the renovated Alhambra "a gift from the International Association of Scientologists to Israel," but this is disputed by Dani Lemberger, head of a former Scientology centre in Haifa.

Mr Lemberger was one of Scientology's main defenders before the Ta'sa-Glazer committee. Today, he is among the church's most outspoken critics. Mr Lemberg was excommunicated by the church last summer and declared a "suppressive person" after visiting Mr Miscavige's former deputy, who left the church several years ago. All those in contact with him in Haifa, including his wife, his staff and followers, have also been banned.

Mr Lemberger says the building, purchased and renovated for more than £10 million, is owned by the Scientology International Reserves Trust, a religious non-profit group registered in East Grinstead, Sussex.

"It doesn't belong to anybody in Israel," says Mr Lemberger. "This new Ideal Org is Miscavige's creation, spending large amounts of donated money for expensive buildings around the world ultimately controlled by him."

"The Church of Scientology under Miscavige has become a cult," says Mr Lemberger. "It has become something that exploits people, promises you eternity, happiness, immortality, if only you follow the path – and along the path you pay them hundreds of thousands of dollars, for the services and for all these donations which is totally and absolutely contrary to what Hubbard said and wrote and asked that we do."

Mr Amicarelli shrugs off the criticism. "This centre is a big service to the city," he says. "This building was a dump. It was abandoned. Now this landmark has been restored and turned into a community centre."

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Netanyahu and Obama's re-election





Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, facing a firestorm at home for his veiled support of Mitt Romney, congratulates President Obama on his reelection
Netanyahu's phone call with Obama Thursday is part of his attempt to short-circuit the criticism he is facing with his own reelection fight entering high gearNEW YORK DAILY NEWS THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2012

BY MATTHEW KALMAN / SPECIAL TO THE NEWS
JERUSALEM — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated President Obama on his reelection as he tried Thursday to stifle controversy that he endangered Israel’s relationship with the U.S. through his not-so-subtle support of Mitt Romney.

“This was a vote of confidence in your leadership,” Netanyahu told Obama during their phone conversation, Israeli left-wing newspaper Haaretz reported.

The Prime Minister, beset by broad criticism that he blundered himself into a corner with Israel’s greatest ally, sent out a press release Thursday to further respond to the firestorm. It said Netanyahu “looked forward to continuing to work with the President to address the great challenges facing the United States and Israel, and to advance peace and security in our region.”

Netanyahu’s seemingly conciliatory gesture was made as his rivals across the political spectrum crowed at his uncomfortable political position following Romney’s narrow defeat. Israeli media commentators piled on the agony.

The mainstream daily Yedioth Ahronot declared Netanyahu “bet on the wrong candidate.” Yossi Sarid mocked the Prime Minister’s predicament in Haaretz: “So sorry, President Obama, please forgive Netanyahu … Don’t be mad at us, dear friend.”

Netanyahu, who must face Israeli voters on Jan. 22, had a frosty relationship with Obama even before an election that saw him featured in a Romney ad. Netanyahu first met Romney in the 1970s when they worked together at a consulting firm. The Prime Minister’s lavish welcome of the GOP challenger during Romney’s gaffe-filled overseas tour contrasted starkly with his thinly-veiled criticism of Obama. He professed neutrality, but seemed to encourage Jewish-American voters to back the Republican candidate.

Such a rare embrace of a presidential challenger by the leader of a U.S. ally has given former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert hope he will be able to emerge from a series of corruption scandals to challenge Netanyahu in Israel’s general election. Addressing Jewish leaders in New York on Wednesday, Olmert accused Netanyahu of “breaking all the rules” by getting involved in the U.S. election “to prefer one candidate over another.”

Olmert is aiming to capitalize on fear within the Israeli electorate that Obama will no longer trust Netanyahu, thereby undermining the bound between the two countries as they confront the threat of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The concern is Obama will push for talks with Iran’s leaders, bucking the hard-line Netanyahu.

“There are those among us who are trying to cause conflict between us and the United States,” Netanyahu said earlier Thursday in a veiled shot at Olmert. “They won’t get away with it. The alliance with the U.S. is firm.”

Within Netanyahu’s informal circle of advisers, there was confidencethe crisis would soon pass.

“Leaders have historically made their decisions on the basis of national interests and political interests, and not on the basis of whether they like or don’t like the head of another country,” said Professor Gerald Steinberg of Bar-Ilan University.

Dore Gold, president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, said the reported tensions between the two leaders are“overstated.”

“Because we’re in a political season in Israel, the Prime Minister’s critics are making hay out of this whole thing.Israel is tied to the U.S.by a multitude of interests and shared values, and that will continue to be the case,” he said.

“Both Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Obama are pragmatic and their countries face a common threat.”

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Netanyahu and the US election

The Independent


Reality bites for Israeli Prime Minister

Benjamin Netanyahu who threw his

solid support behind Mitt Romney

  
MATTHEW KALMAN  JERUSALEM  WEDNESDAY 7 NOVEMBER 2012




Israeli President Shimon Peres and other moderate leaders hailed Mr Obama’s re-election
but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu awoke to a double shock.

“This is probably not a very good morning for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” said
Interior Minister Eli Yishai, a major coalition partner.

After several abrasive encounters with President Barack Obama, Mr Netanyahu and his
Likud Party had thrown their support solidly behind Mitt Romney in what opposition leader
Shaul Mofaz described as “a rude, blunt, unprecedented, wanton and dangerous
intervention in the United States election.”

Mr Netanyahu must hope that Mr Obama will not bear any grudges as Israel tries to
convince the US to take urgent action to halt Iran’s nuclear programme, including a
possible military strike.

President Obama’s victory may also have re-written the cast list and script for Israel’s
own general election on January 22.

Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is now expected to return at the head of a united
opposition list – the first credible challenge to Mr Netanyahu. It is an indication of the poor
state of Israeli politics that opposition’s best hope was forced to resign as prime minister
under suspicion of corruption, has been convicted on one corruption charge and is still on
trial for another.

Mr Netanyahu moved swiftly yesterday to try and repair some of the damage, sending
urgent messages to colleagues to keep quiet. He failed. World Likud Chairman Danny
Danon said Israel “will not surrender” to Mr Obama and his “ill-advised policies.”

Commentators in Yisrael Hayom, the free daily bankrolled by Sheldon Adelson, the casino
magnate who finances both Mr Netanyahu and Mr Romney, warned of impending doom.
“Obama’s re-election means Olmert will run against Netanyahu and a ‘grand bargain’ with
Iran can be made at our expense,” wrote one columnist.

Palestinians were also divided. President Mahmoud Abbas welcomed Mr Obama’s reelection, while Hamas leaders urged him to abandon his pro-Israel bias.

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

Israel stepped back from brink of war with Iran in 2010


The Independent


The day Israeli Prime Minister ordered the military to prepare for war - but was stopped by an internal revolt

MATTHEW KALMAN  JERUSALEM TUESDAY 06  NOVEMBER 2012

The Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came to the brink of triggering war against Iran in 2010, according to charges levelled in an Israeli TV documentary.

According to previews of Uvda ("Fact") on Israel's Channel 2, only a revolt by Israel's military chief and Mossad director prevented the country from being placed on full attack readiness.

Israeli leaders are increasingly alarmed at the Islamic Republic's steady march towards the development of nuclear capability, convinced that the combination of nuclear warheads, a fast-developing ballistic missile industry and repeated calls by Iranian leaders to remove Israel from the map threaten the future existence of the Jewish state.

United States and European-backed sanctions against Iran now appear to be biting, but two years ago they seemed ineffectual in dampening Tehran's nuclear ambitions. In the programme, Mr Barak confirms that at the end of a meeting of Israel's security cabinet in 2010, he and Mr Netanyahu instructed the Chief-of-Staff, Lt-Gen Gabi Ashkenazi, and the Mossad director Meir Dagan to initiate a "P Plus" code – placing the military on full alert to launch an imminent attack.

General Ashkenazi said he was concerned that the heightened alert might set in motion processes that would unwittingly trigger the attack. "It's not something you do if you're not sure you want to follow through with it," General Ashkenazi told his political commanders.

"The army was ready to attack, but I also said that attacking then would be a strategic mistake," he said afterwards.

Mr Dagan was even more blunt. "You might be making an illegal decision about going to war," he warned the Prime Minister and Defence Minister. "Only the cabinet is authorised to decide this."

Afterwards, Mr Dagan said: "The Prime Minister and Defence Minister were trying to hijack a war." US officials launched a public campaign against an Israeli strike. Since leaving office last year, both General Ashkenazi and Mr Dagan have repeatedly criticised Mr Netanyahu and Mr Barak for warmongering against Iran.

Their description mirrors the more recent experience of the former Defence Minister Shaul Mofaz, who briefly joined Mr Netanyahu's government this year.

"Mr Netanyahu is obsessed with an Israeli attack on Iran," said Mr Mofaz. "In the 70 days that I sat in government, more than half the meetings that Mr Netanyahu arranged with me were spent in attempts to persuade me we should attack Iran without American or Western support."

However, Mr Barak said his desire to test Israeli military preparedness had been misinterpreted.

"It's not true that creating the situation whereby the Israel Defence Forces and the other operational arms of the state are on alert for a few hours, a few days, ready to undertake certain operations, forces the state of Israel to carry them out," Mr Barak said.

The two security chiefs were not the only ones who believed they were the only people standing in the way of a major war. By mid-2010, Israeli concerns about Iran were being taken so seriously that leaders of the G8 countries meeting for a summit in Ontario believed "absolutely" that an Israeli attack was imminent, according to Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister at the time.

Both Mr Dagan and General Ashkenazi appear to believe that attempts to counter the Iranian nuclear threat should avoid military action that could escalate into regional conflict. "We must carry out a covert campaign, everything that is below the threshold of war, the threshold of a strike," General Ashkenazi told Israel's Council for Peace and Security in August.

Israel is believed to be responsible for at least three computer viruses that have infected the control systems of Iran's nuclear centrifuges, a series of assassinations of Iranian nuclear research scientists, and a string of mysterious accidents at Iranian military installations.

Saturday, 3 November 2012

Unholy row erupts over Church of the Holy Sepulchre's water bill


The Independent


Priests at holy site are shocked by supplier's demand for arrears and interest of £1.5m


MATTHEW KALMAN  JERUSALEM 
SATURDAY 03  NOVEMBER 2012

Priests at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, which is held to be the site of the Crucifixion and the empty tomb of Jesus Christ, are threatening to close one of Christendom's holiest sites after a water company froze the bank account of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate over millions of pounds in unpaid water bills.

Traditionally, holy places in Jerusalem have been exempt from local taxes and other charges – a policy that was confirmed in 1969 after Israel annexed the Old City.

The status of Christian sites and the sensitive division of their ownership and management between sometimes rival denominations is enshrined in an ancient agreement known as the Status Quo.

Nowhere is the inter-church pact more sensitive than at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, a labyrinthine basilica dating back to the 4th century and mostly owned and managed by the Greek Orthodox church, together with the Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land and the Armenian Patriarchate, with smaller niches reserved for Coptic, Syrian, Ethiopian and other churches.

Under the Status Quo, Christian shrines have been allowed to operate with near-autonomy over the years by the successive Ottoman, British mandate, Jordanian and Israeli governments.

In 1967, when Israel captured the Old City, it continued that pragmatic tradition. Then in 1996 came the privatisation of Jerusalem’s water supply and its transfer from the Israeli municipality to Hagihon Inc.

In 2004, Hagihon sent the church a bill for 3.7 million shekels – the equivalent of nearly £500,000 at the time. The church, thinking it was a mistake, ignored it. Earlier this year, Hagihon returned with a revised demand for nine million shekels – about £1.5m – that included water supplies for the past seven years, plus interest on the unpaid debt.

The two sides began negotiations, assisted by intermediaries from various Israeli government departments and advisers to the Mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat.

Archbishop Aristarchos of Constantina, the general-secretary of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate, the largest church in the Holy Land, told The Independent that the two sides had seemed to be nearing agreement when Hagihon suddenly enforced a court order last week to freeze the patriarchate’s central bank account. “We were in the middle of negotiations and we committed to start to pay from now on,” the archbishop said. “We said we were willing to pay but it was very difficult for us to meet previous debts for which there was no agreement. We asked that the nine million shekels of old debts be deleted.

“But despite the fact that we were in negotiations, Hagihon applied to freeze the account of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate. This was an arbitrary measure since we were negotiating. They should have waited to come to an agreement.”

He said that unless the account was unfrozen, the church would have to consider a “non-confrontational response” that could include closing the church. “We would like to help find a solution. We are not entirely negative. Thousands of pilgrims visit the Church of the Holy Sepulchre every day, and most of the water is used for them,” he said.

Israeli officials were unavailable for comment tonight.

Friday, 2 November 2012

Palestinians furious with Abbas for giving up refugees' right to return


The Independent


 
JERUSALEM
 
FRIDAY 02  NOVEMBER 2012

Palestinian activists have denounced their President, Mahmoud Abbas, for saying he would
ensure there was “never” be a third intifada, or uprising, against Israel - and for giving up
his “right of return” to his Israeli birthplace.

Asked on Israel’s Channel 2 News whether he expected to return to Safed, the hill town in
the northern region of Galilee, where he was born in 1935, Mr Abbas said: “It’s my right to
see it but not to live there. Palestine for me is [the 1967] borders, with East Jerusalem as
its capital. This is now and for ever … I believe West Bank and Gaza is Palestine and the
[rest] Israel.”

Izzat Rishek, a member of the Hamas politburo, said: “This statement [does not] express
the opinion of the Palestinian people … the Palestinian refugees’ right to return to their
cities, villages and homes from where they were forcibly expelled is holy … it is not a
bargaining chip.”

He added: “The Palestinian people will never drop even one particle of the soil of
Palestine… Mr Abbas’ statement doesn’t shock only Palestinians but all Arab peoples.”

Official Palestinian Authority media refrained from comment, but Kuffiya Press, a website
associated with the disgraced former security chief, Mohammed Dahlan, said: “[Mr] Abbas
has offered Israel a rare and symbolic compromise.”

Ali Abunimah, founder of the Electronic Intifada website, denounced Mr Abbas’s “filthy
words”. Azzam Tamimi, a London-based commentator, said: “If Abbas believes he has no
right to his birth place in Palestine, can he claim to be Palestinian?”

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Palestinian divisions threaten UN bid


The Independent


Palestinians still divided as bid looms for UN recognition


 
JERUSALEM
 
THURSDAY 01 NOVEMBER 2012

Rival Palestinian officials from Fatah and Hamas sparred publicly today over reports that
the two sides were once again on the brink of signing a power-sharing agreement before a
new bid for state recognition at the United Nations this month.

The two groups have been at loggerheads since 2007, when Hamas expelled Fatah from
Gaza in a bloody coup, dividing Palestinian territory between the West Bank, ruled by
Fatah, and the Gaza Strip, controlled by Hamas.

Salah Bardawil, a senior Hamas official, said on Wednesday that Hamas had submitted new
proposals for reconciliation to Egyptian mediators in Cairo. Reports suggested that the
Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, might meet as early as next week with the Hamas
leader Khaled Meshaal in the Egyptian capital to sign the deal. A previous agreement
signed by the two in May 2011 was never implemented.

Rumours of a deal that would replace the government of Salam Fayyad, the Prime Minister,
with a cabinet of technocrats prompted Mr Fayyad to seek a public display of support. Mr
Fayyad has said that he would stand aside if necessary to help the reconciliation process.

Nonetheless, Fatah officials said the Hamas announcement was a bluff. “We are not aware
of any new proposals from Hamas,” said Dmitri Diliani, a member of the Fatah Revolutionary
Council. “This is not the time for new ideas. It is time to act on the agreement already
signed and give the people of Gaza the right to vote in elections that has been denied to
them by Hamas.”

“We would prefer reconciliation before applying to the UN for recognition as a state but it
is not a requirement and we will not allow the UN process to be a hostage to the internal
politics of Hamas and their alliances with Iran and other parties,” he said.

Palestinian leaders say they are determined to upgrade their UN status from “observer” to
“non-member state”, setting the stage for a diplomatic showdown that will pit the
Palestinians, Arab states, the developing world and Europe against Israel and the US.

Palestinian envoys were dispatched to Germany, Austria, the United Kingdom, Denmark,
Sweden and Finland this week to persuade those countries to vote in favour of the UN
move.

“We are urging them to vote in favour of the Palestinian proposal,” said the Palestinian
foreign affairs minister, Riad Malki. “We hope this will clarify the picture for those
countries.”

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Israel threatens 'deeper action' over Hamas rocket blitz bombardment


ind

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has warned of "deeper action" to prevent attacks from Gaza after Israeli civilians came under a massive Hamas bombardment yesterday.


MATTHEW KALMAN  JERUSALEM  WEDNESDAY 24 OCTOBER 2012


Ignoring pleas by the Emir of Qatar, who ended a historic visit to Gaza hours earlier, to reduce violence, Hamas said it had joined in launching the rocket barrage – the biggest violation of a tense Israel-Gaza ceasefire in many months.

By mid-afternoon, Palestinian groups had fired more than 70 rockets at Israeli towns and villages bordering the Gaza Strip.

Four Palestinian militants were killed and four people in Israel were injured in two days of violence that began on Tuesday when an Israeli army officer was badly wounded by a bomb planted on the Israel-Gaza border fence. Three foreign workers were injured when a rocket hit an Israeli village near Gaza yesterday. The Palestinians were killed and eight people injured in Israeli air strikes against rocket-launching crews and other militant targets.

The violence erupted as more than 1,000 US troops began the largest ever joint Israel-US military exercise in air defence. "We neither chose nor initiated this escalation but if it continues we are prepared for much more extensive and deeper action," Mr Netanyahu said as he toured an Iron Dome defence battery near Ashkelon. "Whoever intends to attack Israeli citizens needs to know that he will bear the consequences."

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak said that if the barrage continued he would not rule out a ground invasion like the one that killed more than 1,000 Palestinians in late 2008-early 2009.

"Hamas will receive its punishment for what has happened here," he told Israel Radio. "We will do whatever necessary to stop this," .

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum blamed Israel for the "unjustified killing of activists".

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Ultra-orthodox up in arms as Israel prepares to end army exemption



The Independent 


 MATTHEW KALMANJERUSALEM WEDNESDAY 17 OCTOBER 2012

The Israeli Defence Minister, Ehud Barak, has announced plans to draft thousands of Ultra-Orthodox students into the army – a move that could set him at loggerheads with the religious parties in the run-up to a general election in January.

Mr Barak is quarantined from the political battle ahead after quitting the Labour Party. His largely fictional Atzmaut faction is unlikely to attract any votes, and he will either join the Likud party or be nominated as Defence Minister irrespective of whether he enters parliament.

Last week, the army began sending out 15,000 call-up notices to Ultra-Orthodox teenagers who until now have been granted exemption from duty because they are studying in rabbinical seminaries – an arrangement that began in the early years of the state with a few hundred selected students but has now mushroomed to include some 55,000 young men.

The issue of Ultra-Orthodox army service was catapulted back on to the political agenda earlier this year after the High Court struck down the so-called Tal Law that allowed mass exemptions for seminary students, branding it illegal. The Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, lost Kadima from his coalition after failing to enact new legislation.

Mr Barak told a meeting of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee in Jerusalem this week that the army had made "massive preparations" to absorb thousands of new Ultra-Orthodox recruits. He said efforts would initially be directed at 16- to 19-year-olds receiving their first call-up notices, while leaving older students alone for now. "Because we're now in election season, and to facilitate dialogue, I have refrained from setting in stone [directives] regarding those in the interim age bracket," Mr Barak said.

In order to provide high standards of kosher food, Shabbat observance and gender separation, most Ultra-Orthodox soldiers serve in special units, including the Nachal Haredi, the Netzach Yehuda combat battalion and the Shachar hi-tech training unit.

Brigadier-General Gadi Agmon, of the IDF manpower division, said that the army planned to establish four new battalions for Ultra-Orthodox soldiers, including a so-called "hesder" track that combines seminary study with combat service and home-front units where recruits could serve as firefighters, police officers and medics.

Brig-Gen Agmon said "the entire class of 2013" would be processed, but there would be exceptions for star students – as in music, athletics and other fields – and for those deemed medically or psychologically unfit.

Ultra-Orthodox leaders said they would not allow the mass draft to go forward without a fight. Moshe Gafni, an MP from the United Torah Judaism Party, said the government's plan could not be imposed by force. "You don't know what planet you're living on," Mr Gafni told the Defence Minister, warning that any attempt to enforce the draft in the seminaries would spark riots.

Hiddush, an NGO that has campaigned for a fair draft, said Mr Barak's plan was doomed. "Unfortunately there is not the slightest chance that even one yeshiva student will be drafted."

Meanwhile, Mr Barak denied reports he had met secretly with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for peace talks in Jordan last Thursday. According to the Chinese news agency Xinhua, the two met King Abdullah to discuss Mr Barak's plan for a unilateral withdrawal from parts of the West Bank.

The reports sparked furious reactions from Hamas and Islamic Jihad, who berated the Palestinian President for reneging on his vow not to talk to Israeli leaders without a complete freeze on Israeli construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

A Palestinian Startup Success Story


A popular job-seeking Web app highlights an entrepreneurial groundswell.

TECHNOLOGY REVIEW Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Palestine is perhaps not a place you’d immediately associate with cool new Web startups. But here's a success story that shows how the territory's tech industry is starting to blossom.
Souktel, a start-up based in Ramallah on the West Bank, offers a Web-based employment application called JobMatch that blends high and low-tech job-matching services in a way that could be particularly suited to the developing world. 
JobMatch is a mobile and web-based platform that helps potential employers find suitable job seekers by filtering out unsuitable applicants, thereby saving time and cost in the recruitment process. The service now operates in 20 countries in five languages, with more planned. Its creators say it is a big hit in both Rwanda and Somalia.

Job seekers register via SMS, voice, or the Web and create a mini-CV listing their basic qualifications. A search command with a custom-matching weighted algorithm in the back-end filters applicants, matching them with jobs. Employers can look for applicants, browse CVs, or have a vacancy matched to specific CVs.

"The benefit of this is you're only finding content you need, relevant to what you're looking for,” says Vanessa Farquharson of Souktel.
Once registered, job seekers can actively search for jobs, receiving listings via sms or the Web. The technology suits developing markets where many people lack access to the Web but have basic mobile devices.
“Our key proprietary feature is the mobile match engine,” says Kristen Roggemann, Souktel business development manager. “We get a lot of traction in the Arab world with women. Their families might not want them moving to a big city by themselves to try to find a job,” she says.

Souktel currently has 700 employers registered in six countries and has matched more than 5,000 job seekers with jobs or training. The company is also behind the AidLink service which has become a key tool for aid workers in developing countries and is now helping streamline delivery of aid to Syrian refugees.
Souktel’s success reflects a rising entrepreneurial groundswell in the Palestinian tech sector that has seen its contribution to the economy leap from less than 1 percent of Palestinian GDP in 2008 to around 8 percent last year. In September, Sadara Ventures, the first early-stage IT VC partnership established in Palestine, announced the inaugural allocation from its $30 million fund, a $1 million investment in the travel startup Yamsafer.

Saturday, 15 September 2012


The Independent 

'We'd do anything for Israel, but we don't do that,' say Mossad's female secret weapons

For the first time in Israeli history, five agents have been allowed to give interviews

 MATTHEW KALMAN, JERUSALEM SATURDAY 15 SEPTEMBER 2012

When it's time for Ella, a 38-year-old wife and mother, to go to work, she slips out before her family wake up.

"I leave a secure home, my husband and three small children sleeping safely in their beds with tears welling in my eyes and a growing lump in my throat," says Ella, whose surname is an Israeli state secret and whose first name is probably something else entirely.

"Ella" is an agent of the Mossad, Israel's feared foreign secret service. For the first time in Israeli history, Ella and four colleagues have been allowed to give interviews.

Their rare comments in the Hebrew-language magazine Lady Globes were published this week as details emerged in The New Yorker of one of the Mossad's greatest triumphs, the exposé of a Syrian nuclear-weapons facility in 2007 that Israel later destroyed.

The role of female Mossad agents emerged in 1986 when "Cindy" lured smitten nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu from London to Italy, where he was drugged, kidnapped and shipped secretly to Israel and spent 18 years in prison.

The secret sisterhood admit that they often feel they are "living in a movie, on a constant high" but are at pains to dismiss the idea that they are merely sexual weapons.

"A man who wants to gain access to a forbidden area has less chance of being allowed in. A smiling woman has a bigger chance of success," Yael, a Mossad legend, tells Lady Globes.

"We use our femininity because any means is valid," says Efrat, another agent. "But even if we think that the way to advance the mission is to sleep with [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad's chief of staff, no one in the Mossad would allow us to do it. Women agents are not used for sexual purposes. We flirt, but the line is drawn at sex."

Only a tiny percentage who apply to join the Mossad are accepted. Of the thousands who apply, most are weeded out by the screening process. Half the candidates who begin the final two-year training course are rejected, including decorated graduates of Israel's top military-commando units.

"Someone who can't handle the pressure or whose interpersonal skills are not very good will be thrown off the course," Yael says. "There are some very talented people who begin sweating or stuttering or blanking out. That's a no-go."

In an equally rare departure from protocol, Mossad chief Tamir Pardo tells Lady Globes that there are an equal number of men and women field agents. "Women have a distinct advantage in secret warfare because of their ability to multitask," Mr Pardo says, adding that women are better at playing a role and superior to men when it comes to "suppressing their ego in order to attain the goal".

"Women are gifted at deciphering situations. Contrary to stereotypes, you see that women's abilities are superior to men in terms of understanding the territory, reading situations, spatial awareness. When they're good, they're very good."

"As for overcoming fear, we're all afraid. Fear crosses gender lines," Mr Pardo says.

Behind enemy lines: Women spies
Anna Chapman
The "real-life Bond girl" was arrested and deported from the United States in 2010, accused of being one of 10 Russian sleeper agents. Far from leading a quiet life once back in Russia, she received a medal from then-President Dmitry Medvedev and praise from then-Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and now has a career as a television presenter and model.

Eileen Nearne
One of 39 British women parachuted into France as agents in "Churchill's secret army" during the Second World War, Nearne played a key role in preparing the French Résistance ahead of the D-Day landings in June 1944. She helped to recruit more than 14,000 agents for espionage and sabotage missions behind enemy lines, and was later awarded the Croix de Guerre by the French government. She died in 2010, aged 89.

Mata Hari
Born Margaretha Geertruida Zelle in the Netherlands, Hari had gained fame as a dancer and courtesan before the First World War. She was accused by the French authorities of spying for Germany, court-martialled and executed by firing squad in 1917. A French intelligence report said she had admitted sending "general information" to the Germans but not military secrets.

Monday, 10 September 2012

Outcry at new university in occupied territory


The Independent 

 MATTHEW KALMAN MONDAY 10 SEPTEMBER 2012
Israel will soon have a fully fledged university operating from a West Bank settlement, thecabinet decided yesterday, despite opposition from groups that say it is a manoeuvre to strengthen Israel's presence in the territory that Palestinians claim as their future state.

The Education Minister, Gideon Saar, pushed through the controversial proposal to upgrade the Ariel University Centre of Samaria, a higher education college near Nablus, to full university status, defying the opposition of the top higher education official and the heads of six of Israel's seven research universities who have lodged an appeal against the move with the high court.

"I firmly believe that the establishment of an eighth university will enhance the higher education system in Israel," Mr Saar told the cabinet meeting in Jerusalem. "Forty years have passed since the last research university was established in Israel and since then the population has increased almost threefold."

The college, founded in 1982 as a regional branch of Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv, is the only Israeli institution of higher education in the occupied West Bank, apart from two teacher-training colleges. It became independent in 2004 and has sought university status ever since.

Many education officials warned that the international repercussions could be disastrous for Israeli universities already threatened by a small but vociferous academic boycott campaign. In a letter to the government, the heads of Israel's universities described the move as "a mortal blow to the higher education system in Israel".

Saturday, 8 September 2012

Death in Gaza


The 18-year-old boy who burned himself to death, the agony of his mother ‒ and a savage reminder of the reality of life in Gaza

Called mother to beg for forgiveness before pouring a bottle of petrol over himself and setting himself on fire
Bystanders rushed to his aid with water and blankets but it wasn't enough


By MATTHEW KALMAN

MAIL ON SUNDAY 9 September 2012

Al-Shati refugee camp is a miserable place: 90,000 Palestinians are packed into less than one-third of a square mile on the northern beach of Gaza City. The narrow, twisting alleys are littered with rubbish and adorned with graffiti and the laundry of the residents. Water and electricity supplies are intermittent at best.

Ihab Abu Nader was born into this crushing poverty on July 9, 1994, the second of six children. Ihab’s ambition was to finish school, get a job and save up enough money to buy a motorcycle.

He loved Real Madrid and dreamed of joining the thousands of Palestinians who have escaped the stifling poverty of Gaza to work abroad in one of the nearby Arab states.

Mourning: Raeda Abu Nader with a picture of her son who set himself on fire due to the ongoing problems in his homeland of Palestine
Mourning: Raeda Abu Nader with a picture of her son who set himself on fire due to the ongoing problems in his homeland of Palestine

But Ihab’s dreams came to a brutal end last week when, after an anguished telephone plea begging his mother for forgiveness, he doused himself in petrol in the middle of a Gaza street and set himself on fire.

Bystanders extinguished the flames with water and blankets and rushed him across the road to the city’s Shifa Hospital, but it was too late. Ihab died last Sunday morning after four days in a coma on life-support, succumbing to the crippling third-degree burns that covered 85 per cent of his body.

We could hear the rattle of small-arms fire as we passed through the grim, barbed-wire corridors of  the heavily fortified Erez border crossing, the only pedestrian access between Israel and the Gaza Strip.The Palestinians of Gaza are not strangers to death. On the day we visited Ihab’s grief-stricken family, three Palestinian militants were killed by Israeli forces as they tried to attach a bomb to the border fence.

Suicide victim Ihab Abu Nader (right) with his friend Mohaamed Jaber last winter
Suicide victim Ihab Abu Nader (right) with his friend Mohaamed Jaber last winter

The night before our arrival, three other Palestinians were killed by an Israeli air strike as they drove near the Al-Bureij refugee camp, apparently on their way to fire rockets at homes in southern Israel.

But even among the war-weary population of Gaza, the self-immolation of Ihab Abu Nader has triggered shockwaves of soul-searching.

Gazans wonder aloud whether Ihab’s suicide by fire, the first here, would have the same effect as the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi in Tunisia in December 2010 that triggered the Arab Spring.

In the week that followed Ihab’s death, two more Palestinians tried to set themselves on fire at anti-government demonstrations but were saved by passers-by.

‘It’s a huge tragedy which should really open the eyes of the rest of the world about the situation of Gaza under the blockade,’ said Karl Schembri of Oxfam’s Gaza office.

Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas-appointed prime minister of Gaza’s unofficial government and a resident  of Al-Shati camp, came to pay his respects to Ihab’s father Sufian and mother Raeda Abu Nader, during the family’s three days of official mourning.

Haniyeh invited them to his home and promised them a small plot of land, a job for their oldest son, Mohammed, and a £1,200 grant.

 A giant poster of Ihab is seen on the wall in the family's home in the overpopulated Al-Shati Palestinian refugee camp in central Gaza
A giant poster of Ihab is seen on the wall in the family's home in the overpopulated Al-Shati Palestinian refugee camp in central Gaza

Sufian told The Mail On Sunday: ‘I don’t believe my son wanted to kill himself. The people who tried to save him said he was screaming at them to put out the fire. I think it was a cry for help. I hope that other young people will take his suffering as a warning.’

He went on: ‘I don’t know what I will do without him. I feel as though I have lost my arms and my legs.

‘Haniyeh is the only Palestinian official who has given us any support, but it’s still not enough. I have £5,000 of debts. After I pay my rent and service the loans I have taken out, I have just £30 a month left for food and everything else. How will I manage?

‘If I could, I would leave here tomorrow. I am ready to take my family and go to any other country that will take us as refugees. I see no future here. There is no work. I don’t want to lose the rest of my children because of this terrible poverty.’

The main room of the Abu Nader home where his family received visitors last week has no windows or heating.

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of the Islamic group Hamas paid his respects to the parents of Ihab Abu Nader

The only natural light creeps in through the wide gaps where the plastered cinder-block walls fail to meet the bare, corrugated iron roof, which leaks in the winter and bakes in the long hot summer.

One corner of the room is dominated by a water tank – empty because the pump that sucks up the water from the mains is broken.

There are only two bedrooms – one for Sufian, his wife and their nine-year-old twin boys Bassem and Bassam, and another which the family’s daughter, 14-year-old Samah, is forced to share with her two older brothers. The tiny kitchen is also the bathroom. There is no door to the toilet, just a flimsy curtain.

Ihab was doing well at school but decided to leave in the summer of 2011 and forego his final year of studies, hoping to find a job and help support his family. But there were no jobs to be had. Unemployment in Gaza is 38 per cent. The area used to export furniture, clothing and other goods to Israel, but trade crashed with the outbreak of the intifada uprising in 2000.

After the kidnapping of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit in 2006 and a 2007 coup in which Hamas seized control, Israel and Egypt clamped an economic embargo on Gaza. An Israeli invasion in 2008 put more pressure on the depressed economy.

Today, the blockade is easing and the economy is slowly expanding but the UN reported last week that gross domestic product per capita in Gaza in 2011 was still ten per cent below its 2005 level. Half of all Palestinians remain below the poverty line.

Three hundred trucks a day pour into Gaza from Israel carrying food, clothing, building and medical supplies and aid from foreign donors, but refugee families like the Abu Naders scrape by on minimum wages and handouts from the UN.

Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit saluting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he disembarks from an army helicopter
Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit saluting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he disembarks from an army helicopter

After he left school, Ihab eked out a few pennies by selling packets of crisps outside mosques every Friday, but he had no licence and was chased away by police. He ended up owing money to the wholesaler. During Ramadan, he secured a job earning £3.50 a day working 14 hours a day for two days a week making falafel, the fried chick-pea patties that are a Gaza fast-food staple.

‘Once he had a job, he woke up happy every morning. He loved to work,’ said his father.

But when Ramadan ended, so did the work. Realising he would never get a proper job, Ihab decided to go back to school, but the principal wouldn’t allow him to return.

Ihab’s mobile phone hinted at his despair. Its wallpaper portrayed a man holding his head in his hands with the title ‘Father of suffering.’ A caption read: ‘I swear to God: We’re sick, we’re bored.’

On Tuesday, August 28, he left home, saying he was trying once again to find work. He didn’t return by nightfall. His mother, who had given Ihab her phone so he could keep in touch, went to a neighbour to call and ask where he was.

‘I’m not in all of Gaza. I’m not in this world. In a couple of hours you will hear my news,’ he said ominously, using an Arabic phrase that refers to the report of someone’s death.
Palestinian doctors at Shifa Hospital in Gaza have seen some terrible things
Palestinian doctors at Shifa Hospital in Gaza have seen some terrible things

‘Forgive me, mother,’ he begged. ‘I am sick of life. There is no work. Forgive me.’

Ihab was in a park with a neighbour, Mohammed Jaber. ‘He was carrying a plastic bottle of petrol,’ said Mohammed. ‘I thought it must be for the generator. He distracted my attention and jumped in a taxi. I didn’t know where he had gone.’

The family scoured Gaza City all night trying to find him. The following morning, his mother and a neighbour went to the hospital, fearing he had been in an accident. Police there said a young man had tried to set himself on fire.

Sufian said: ‘I blame the Israeli occupation and the siege for our situation. I blame the divisions between the West Bank and Gaza.

‘But I say to young Palestinians: don’t do what Ihab did. It was a mistake. Keep looking, keep learning. Education is the only future.

‘We need more support for social clubs, for unemployment programmes and job opportunities that will give our young people hope.’

Sunday, 2 September 2012

WIDOWS DEMAND JUSTICE OVER MUNICH KILLINGS

SUNDAY EXPRESS
Sunday September 2, 2012

By Matthew Kalman

WIDOWS of Israeli athletes murdered at the Munich Olympics by Palestinians are demanding answers after newly declassified documents exposed massive government incompetence and later collusion with the terrorists.

Eleven members of the Israeli team were killed after eight Black September terrorists broke into their apartment at the Olympic village in Munich in 1972.

Two Israelis died initially, nine more were taken hostage and killed during a botched rescue attempt.

Government records published by German magazine Der Spiegel last week reveal the West German government “maintained secret contacts with the organisers of the attack for years afterward and appeased the Palestinians to prevent further bloodshed on German soil”.

Ankie Spitzer, widow of murdered fencing coach Andre Spitzer, demanded: “The German government should open all the documents it has been hiding, reveal all its failures and draw conclusions, so that justice is finally served.”

Ilana Romano, widow of weightlifter Yossef Romano, said: “There was chaos and irresponsibility.”

Her husband was shot, tortured and bled to death in front of his bound teammates.

“There is no other way but for Germany to stand up and admit to its mistakes. It is time for it to open its Pandora’s box and tell the world about its errors,” she added.

Der Spiegel reveals that West Germany declined to ask for the extradition of Mohammed Daoud Oudeh, the Munich mastermind, when he was later arrested in France. The Bonn government also gladly surrendered the three PLO terrorists captured in Munich when a Lufthansa plane was hijacked a few weeks after the Olympics.

From contacts now revealed between German diplomats and Black September leaders, there are suspicions that the Lufthansa hijacking was staged with the tacit connivance of Bonn.

The magazine reports that within months of the Olympics massacre, there was “active but secret diplomatic communication between Germans and Palestinians.

“West German representatives were talking to men like Abu Youssef, Ali Salameh and Amin al-Hindi, all of them masterminds of the Munich murders.”

Black September was revealed to be a front for Yasser Arafat’s Fatah group in the PLO. The financier of the operation was Mahmoud Abbas, Arafat’s deputy and now president of the PLO and the Palestinian Authority.

Meanwhile, Israeli Cabinet documents and other material declassified last week reveal the agonising drama unfolding, minute by minute, via cables and phone calls from Munich and growing frustration among Israeli officials at the Germans’ incompetence.

The kidnappers agreed to fly in two helicopters with the hostages to a nearby military airfield to board a plane to Cairo.

The plane was manned by undercover Bavarian police. The plan was to draw the kidnappers into the open at the airfield where they would be shot by snipers but events went tragically wrong. When five terrorists emerged from the helicopters, the snipers opened fire. The terrorists set alight to one of the helicopters with the hostages inside and shot the others dead. A German police officer also died.

Mossad chief Zvi Zamir flew to Germany to help direct the rescue. In a bitter report to the Israeli government, he said he saw “confusion and inaction”.

Most chilling was the complaint by West German Chancellor Willy Brandt to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir about Israeli criticism of his decision to release the three surviving terrorists after the Lutfhansa hijacking that October. “There was no other choice,” he wrote. Yet according to documents, diplomats were making a deal with the PLO. Says Der Spiegel: “Any contact with West German representatives, even in secret, upgraded the PLO’s status as an institution.

“In return, the government of then Chancellor Willy Brandt... hoped to protect Germany from further attacks.

“But the price they had to pay in return appears to have been high.”

Friday, 31 August 2012

Citizen Adelson - On The Media


CITIZEN ADELSON

NPR ON THE MEDIA

Friday, August 31, 2012


(Mike Clarke/Getty/Getty)


Turns out Sheldon Adelson, casino magnate and, as of late, Mitt Romney supporter, also owns Israel’s most popular daily newspaper, Israel HaYom. Freelance Jerusalem-based journalistMatthew Kalman says the free, aggressively pro-Netanyahu paper has quickly come to dominate the market while its competitors downsize and slash staff.  

GUESTS:

 Matthew Kalman

HOSTED BY:

 Brooke Gladstone


Tuesday, 28 August 2012

Israel court rules it was not at fault in 2003 death of U.S. activist killed by army bulldozer

By MATTHEW KALMAN

DAILY MAIL, 28 August 2012

An Israeli judge has ruled that the death of pro-Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie in Gaza in 2003 was an accident

An Israeli judge has ruled that the death of pro-Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie in Gaza in 2003 was an accident
An Israeli judge has ruled that the death of pro-Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie in Gaza in 2003 was an accident that she had brought on herself by entering a closed military zone at the height of the second intifada.
Corrie was 23 when she was killed in March 2003 as she and other members of the International Solidarity Movement acted as human shields to prevent the bulldozing of Palestinian homes in Rafah on the Gaza-Egypt border.
The Israeli army said the buildings were being used to attack Israeli soldiers and as covers for entrances to weapons smuggling tunnels beneath the border.
Judge Oded Gershon dismissed a civil lawsuit brought by Corrie’s family against the state of Israel claiming symbolic damages of $1. 'I reject the suit,' the judge said. 'There is no justification to demand the state pay any damages.'
Reading from his 162-page verdict, the judge told the Haifa District Court that Corrie’s death was a 'regrettable accident' but could have been avoided if she had obeyed warning signs and a travel ban on the Gaza Strip issued by the US to its citizens.
The area had been formally declared 'a closed military zone' by the Israeli army, banning all civilians from entering.
'She did not distance herself from the area, as any thinking person would have done," he said.
He rejected the claim of negligence, saying the driver of the bulldozer could not see her. 'She consciously put herself in harm’s way,' Gershon said.
The driver testified that he did not see Corrie or even know he had hit her until after the accident.
The judge slammed the International Solidarity Movement, saying it 'abuses the human rights discourse to blur its actions which are de facto violence.'
The judge continued: 'This included an army of activists serving as 'human shields' for terrorists wanted by Israeli security forces, financial and logistical aid to Palestinians including terrorists and their families.'

Activist: Rachel Corrie is seen confronting an Israeli bulldozer in the Gaza Strip town of Rafah in 2003
Activist: Rachel Corrie is seen confronting an Israeli bulldozer in the Gaza Strip town of Rafah in 2003
Her mother, Cindy Corrie, who was in court to hear the verdict with her husband and surviving daughter, said the family would appeal to Israel’s high court.
'I am hurt,' Mrs Corrie said after the verdict. 'We are deeply saddened and troubled by what we heard today in the court. This was a bad day, not only for us, but for human rights, humanity, the rule of law and the country of Israel.'
'We believe Rachel Corrie was seen. Everything through this process confirmed at least one soldier saw her.
'We believe the bulldozer driver had the ability and responsibility to see what was in front of his machine,' she said.
The Corrie family said the judge had effectively whitewashed an earlier military investigation that was not the 'thorough, credible and transparent' probe promised by the Israeli government.
US diplomats, who were in court to hear the verdict, had also complained that the Israeli army had failed to properly investigate the incident.
'We believe the decision does not comply with international law,' said the Corrie family’s lawyer, Hussein Abu Hussein, vowing to appeal the verdict to Israel’s highest court.

Sunday, 26 August 2012

Israeli inquiry into Rachel Corrie death insufficient, US ambassador tells family

US government does not believe military inquiry was 'thorough, credible and transparent', as family await verdict in civil suit


  • Matthew Kalman in Jerusalem
  • guardian.co.uk, Friday 24 August 2012 15.45 BST
Rachel Corrie
Rachel Corrie died trying to stop an Israeli army bulldozer from destroying Palestinian houses in Rafah in 2003. Photograph: Denny Sternstein/AP


The US ambassador to Israel has told the family of an American pro-Palestinian activist who was killed in Gaza in 2003 that the US government remains dissatisfied with the Israeli army's decision to close its official investigation into the incident.

Rachel Corrie, 23, an activist with the International Solidarity Movement, was crushed to death as she tried to stop an Israeli army bulldozer from destroying Palestinian houses in Rafah, on the Egypt-Gaza border.

In 2005 Corrie's family filed a civil suit in the Haifa district court against the Israeli government over the incident. A verdict is expected on Tuesday.

At a meeting at the US embassy in Tel Aviv last week, the ambassador, Dan Shapiro, told Corrie's parents and her sister that the government did not believe the Israeli military investigation had been "thorough, credible and transparent", as had been promised by Israel. The investigation concluded that Corrie's death was an accident and that she had endangered herself by entering a combat zone.

"The lawsuit is just a small step in our family's nearly decade-long search for truth and justice," said Craig Corrie, Rachel's father. "The mounting evidence presented before the court underscores a broken system of accountability.

"We're responsible as a family to do whatever we can to get at the truth of what happened to Rachel and to try to get some accountability. It's been a very difficult process for us. The testimony by the defence witnesses has been erratic. Their stories never agreed with each other. We hope the judge will reach a reasonable conclusion."